Poor Justice
by
Discovering Identity in Civil Procedure
Anthony V. Alfieri
83 S. Cal. L. Rev. 453 (2010)
SSRN HeinOnline
Integrating Racial Justice into the Civil Procedure Survey Course
Kevin R. Johnson
54 J. Legal Educ. 242 (2004)
SSRN HeinOnline
A Diamond in the Rough: Trans-Substantivity of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Its Detrimental Impact on Civil Rights
Suzette Malveaux
92 Wash. U. L. Rev. 455 (2014)
Wash. U. L. Rev. Archive HeinOnline
Conley and Twombly: A Critical Race Theory Perspective
Roy L. Brooks
52 How. L.J. 31 (2008)
HeinOnline
The Vanishing Plaintiff
Brooke D. Coleman
42 Seton Hall L. Rev. 501 (2012)
SSRN HeinOnline
Critical Race Empiricism: A New Means to Measure Civil Procedure
Victor D. Quintanilla
3 UC Irvine L. Rev. 187 (2014)
SSRN HeinOnline
Facilitating Wage Theft: How Courts Use Procedural Rules to Undermine Substantive Rights of Low-Wage Workers
Nantiya Ruan
63 Vand. L. Rev. 727 (2010)
SSRN HeinOnline
Access to Civil Justice and Race, Class, and Gender Inequality
Rebecca L. Sandefur
34 Ann. Rev. Soc. 339 (2008)
SSRN
United States v. Hatahley: A Legal Archaeology Case Study in Law and Racial Conflict
Debora Threedy
34 Am. Indian L. Rev. 1 (2008)
SSRN HeinOnline
Arbitration and the Batson Principle
Sarah Rudolph Cole & E. Gary Spitko
38 Ga. L. Rev. 1145 (2004)
SSRN HeinOnline
The Mediation Alternative: Process Dangers for Women
Trina Grillo
100 Yale L.J. 1545 (1991)
HeinOnline
Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) and Minorities in the Federal Court
Solomon Oliver, Jr.
39 Cap. U.L. Rev. (2011)
HeinOnline
Negotiating the Situation: The Reasonable Person in Context
Lu-in Wang
14 Lewis & Clark L. Rev. 1285 (2010)
SSRN HeinOnline
Resolving Race Discrimination in Employment Disputes Through Mediation: A Win-Win for All Parties
Floyd D. Weatherspoon & Kendall D. Isaac
5 Am. J. Mediation 111 (2011)
SSRN HeinOnline
United States v. Hatahley: A Legal Archaeology Case Study in Law and Racial Conflict
Debora Threedy
34 Am. Indian L. Rev. 1 (2008)
SSRN HeinOnline
Civil Procedure Stories
by
No Good Deed Goes Unpunished: Protecting Gender Discrimination Named Plaintiffs from Employer Attacks
Hillary Jo Baker
20 Hastings Women's L.J. 83 (2009)
HeinOnline
Why Slavery Reparations Are Good for Civil Procedure Class
Bob Carlson
47 St. Louis U. L.J. 139 (2003)
HeinOnline
Reinvigorating Commonality: Gender & Class Actions
Brooke D. Coleman & Elizabeth G. Porter
92 N.Y.U. L. Rev. 895 (2017)
SSRN HeinOnline
The History Behind Hansberry v. Lee
Allen R. Kamp
20 U.C. Davis L. Rev. 481 (1987)
U.C. Davis HeinOnline
The Modern Class Action Rule: Its Civil Rights Roots and Relevance Today
Suzette M. Malveaux
66 U. Kan. L. Rev. 325 (2017)
SSRN HeinOnline
Disability, Disparate Impact, and Class Actions
Michael Stein & Michael Evan Waterstone
56 Duke L.J. 861 (2006)
SSRN HeinOnline
Unfolding Discovery Issues That Plague Sexual Harassment Suits
Katie M. Patton
57 Hastings L.J. 991 (2006)
HeinOnline
Difference Made Legal: The Court and Dr. King
David Luban
87 Mich. L. Rev. 2152 (1989)
HeinOnline
Kennedy, King, Shuttlesworth and Walker: The Events Leading to the Introduction of the Civil Rights Act of 1964
David Benjamin Oppenheimer
29 U.S.F. L. Rev. 645 (1995)
SSRN HeinOnline
Martin Luther King, Walker v. City of Birmingham, and the Letter from Birmingham Jail
David Benjamin Oppenheimer
26 U.C. Davis L. Rev. 791 (1993)
U.C. Davis HeinOnline
Do Judges Vary in Their Treatment of Race?
David Abrams et al.
41 J. Legal Stud. 347 (2012)
SSRN HeinOnline
The Realism of Race in Judicial Decision Making: An Empirical Analysis of Plaintiffs' Race and Judges' Race
Pat K. Chew & Robert E. Kelley
28 Harv. J. Racial & Ethnic Just 91 (2012)
SSRN HeinOnline
Judging Women
Stephen J. Choi et al.
8 J. Empirical Legal Stud. 504 (2011)
SSRN HeinOnline
Implicit Bias in the Courtroom
Jerry Kang et al.
59 UCLA L. Rev. 1124 (2012)
SSRN HeinOnline
Gender & Justice: Why Women in the Judiciary Really Matter
by
Implicit Bias in the Courtroom
Jerry Kang et al.
59 UCLA L. Rev. 1124 (2012)
SSRN HeinOnline
Race and Representation in Jury Service Selection
Kurt M. Saunders
36 Duq. L. Rev. 49 (1997)
SSRN HeinOnline
Are Ideal Litigators White? Measuring the Myth of Colorblindness
Jerry Kang et al.
7 J. Empirical Legal Stud. 886 (2010)
SSRN HeinOnline
Negotiating Jurisdiction: State Authority over Indian Country Granted by Public Law 280
Robert T. Anderson
87 Wash. L. Rev. 915 (2012)
SSRN HeinOnline
New Evidence that Dred Scott was Wrong About Whether Free Blacks Could Count for the Purposes of Federal Diversity Jurisdiction
Stanton D. Krauss
37 Conn. L. Rev. 25 (2004)
SSRN HeinOnline
Categorical Federalism: Jurisdiction, Gender and the Globe
Judith Resnik
111 Yale L.J. 619 (2001)
SSRN HeinOnline
Reconstructing Equality: Of Justice, Justicia, and the Gender of Jurisdiction
Judith Resnik
14 Yale J. L. & Feminism 393 (2002)
SSRN HeinOnline
Judicial Deference to Nonlegal Decisionmakers: Imposing Simplistic Solutions on Problems of Cognitive Complexity in Mental Disability Law
Donald N. Bersoff
46 SMU L. Rev. 329 (1992)
SMU Law Review HeinOnline
Lassiter v. Department of Social Services: Why is it Such a Lousy Case?
Brooke D. Coleman
12 Nev. L.J. 591 (2012)
SSRN HeinOnline
Politics and Due Process: The Rhetoric of Social Security Disability Law
Anthony Taibi
1990 Duke L.J. 913 (1990)
Duke Law Journal HeinOnline
#SoWhiteMale: Federal Civil Rulemaking
Brooke D. Coleman
113 Nw. U. L. Rev. Online 52 (2018)
Northwestern Univ. Law Review HeinOnline
The Committee That Dictates the Rules of American Courts Looks Nothing Like America—or the Federal Judiciary
Brooke D. Coleman
Oct. 24, 2018
Slate
Statutes of Limitations: A Policy Analysis in the Context of Reparations Litigation
Suzette M. Malveaux
74 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 68 (2005)
SSRN HeinOnline
Processing Civil Rights Summary Judgment and Consumer Discrimination Claims
Deseriee A. Kennedy
53 Depaul L. Rev. 989 (2004)
SSRN HeinOnline
The Dangers of Summary Judgment: Gender and Federal Civil Litigation
Elizabeth M. Schneider
59 Rutgers L. Rev. 705 (2007)
SSRN HeinOnline
